<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Autopsy of Distributed Systems on Tuan Hiep TRAN — The Principal Craft</title><link>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/series/autopsy-of-distributed-systems/</link><description>Recent content in Autopsy of Distributed Systems on Tuan Hiep TRAN — The Principal Craft</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.162.1</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/series/autopsy-of-distributed-systems/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Autopsy of Distributed Systems (4/4): The Integrity Fallacy &amp; The DLQ Mandate</title><link>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/4.the_integrity_fallacy_data_loss/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/4.the_integrity_fallacy_data_loss/</guid><description>A queue with zero lag can still be a crime scene. We conclude the series by dissecting the &amp;lsquo;Catch-and-Commit&amp;rsquo; anti-pattern and establishing why a Dead Letter Queue is an architectural mandate, not a luxury.</description></item><item><title>Autopsy of Distributed Systems (3/4): The Protocol Trap &amp; The Lease Paradox</title><link>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/3.the_protocol_trap_broker_semantics/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/3.the_protocol_trap_broker_semantics/</guid><description>Distributed brokers use leases to detect life. We dissect how the &amp;lsquo;MAX_VALUE&amp;rsquo; configuration trap disables a system&amp;rsquo;s autonomic immune response, turning transient failures into permanent paralysis.</description></item><item><title>Autopsy of Distributed Systems (2/4): The Concurrency Collapse &amp; Reactive Starvation</title><link>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/2.concurrency_collapse_thread_starvation/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/2.concurrency_collapse_thread_starvation/</guid><description>Asynchronous frameworks do not eliminate latency; they merely shift the bottleneck. We dissect how a single blocking I/O call inside a reactive pipeline can trigger a catastrophic thread starvation event.</description></item><item><title>Autopsy of Distributed Systems (1/4): The Observability Mirage &amp; Zombie Consumers</title><link>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/1.the_observability_mirage_zombie_consumers/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tuanhiep.github.io/principal/posts/series_3/1.the_observability_mirage_zombie_consumers/</guid><description>When a dashboard reports 100% health but throughput is zero, the system isn&amp;rsquo;t dead—it&amp;rsquo;s paralyzed. We dissect thread starvation, the illusion of structural health checks, and the math behind a system collapse.</description></item></channel></rss>